Recent comments

Browse archives

« January 2009  
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Cluster Map

Since 26 Oct 2006
Locations of visitors to this page

Legal

Creative Commons License
Legal Information
Steven R. Livingstone
2004-05-04

User login

Talkback on Voyeurism - The Aristotelian position

Steven @ Fri, 2006-08-11 00:03

The other day I read a short weblog entry on traffic accidents, specifically how motorists often slow down to observe the crash site. In this particular incident there was no wanton safety requirement for the motorists to slow down. Indeed we sometimes even see this behaviour in traffic flowing in the opposite direction, when the roads are completely separate.

The debate inspired me to write a short response, and it involves an argument I recently published with Prof. Thompson in the Journal of Music Perception regarding the evolutionary origins of music. It's talkback time, so let me know what you think.

 I believe this behaviour has a lot less to do with voyeurism, and more with our curious and empathic nature. Undeniably there is a degree of perverted interest at play here (taking a looser definition)1, like watching the race track or skateboard competitions and hoping for a smash. I posit however, that what we are seeing here is in part our desire to understand, to learn, and to gain experience. I take this argument from Aristotle's treatise on Metaphysics; that we look because "all men naturally desire knowledge." [2

You could argue that is why we hope for "carnage", be it on a road or in a Big Brother house; by experiencing these things we are better equipped to handle these situations if we ever find ourselves in them. Naturally, the inner turmoil one faces of hoping to see a smash (knowledge), yet not wanting anyone to actually get seriously hurt (empathy/survival of species) alludes to this.

1.  Voyeur, n. A person whose sexual desires are stimulated or satisfied by covert observation of the sex organs or sexual activities of others. Courtesy of Oxford English Dictionary.

Filed under: Philosophy | Talkback
 
Edison Walcott (not verified)
Fri, 2006-08-11 16:32
 

Talk about over analysing a situation. I don't think this issue is as complex as you think - maybe people are just sticky-beaks? I know when I pass an accident I only slow down and look because everyone else seems to be and I am just interested to see what is going on. Plain and simple!

 
Fri, 2006-08-11 18:39
 

I think that's a very good point. Whenever an event occurs it is absolutely natural to observe it in order to gauge its significance in relation to us. However I believe there is a point in time beyond which we are no longer assessing how it affects us, but rather becomes voyeuristic fulfilment which then falls under the article's discussion. For example, a small girl drops her ice-cream, you might observe this for 1 or 2 seconds depending on the context and then continue on; but if you're a mean or curious person you might like to continue watching to see if she then breaks into tears, and how her parent/minder might react to the whole thing.

 
daz (not verified)
Fri, 2006-08-11 10:46
 

Steven. I agree with your position. I think I recall reading a similar blog where the author expressed disgust over the slowing down of traffic going in the opposite direction to a major crash on the Pacific Motorway a few weeks ago. They attributed the slow down in the traffic to the apparent voyeuristic need in human beings. I didn't believe it was the case. I stated my disgust that they were seemingly more concerned that the traffic wasn't going at adequete speed, rather than concern over the possible loss of life. An intetresting study would to be monitor the speed of motorists passing a traffic incident to see if these 'voyeuristic' instincts cause the traffic to slow down that much.

The way I see it - its better to be stuck in traffic than dead.

 
Fri, 2006-08-11 18:42
 

Yeah it's a bit of a shitty time to live in when we care more about how we're going to be 5 minutes later, over someone having the discourtesy of well, dying, and holding us up.

I remember once I was driving back with the family one late night, we were pressed for time due to some flood hold up or something, when up ahead there was a huge traffic jam. Apparently some semi had just destroyed a family car not two minutes before we got there. I realised that had we been in a different lane, or not taken that last toilet break or gone 1km/hr faster or any other of a dozen different actions, that could have been us spread across the road. It kind of freaked me out and changed the way I viewed traffic accidents.